When Android founder Andy Rubin left Google in 2014, the departure was sudden, if not shrouded in thriller. A couple of years later, a New York Instances expose revealed that Rubin was primarily pressured out of the search big as a consequence of a handful of sexual misconduct claims from different Google staff. In ousting Rubin, Google paid the famed engineer a whopping $90 million when it may have merely fired him outright. Naturally, when the story surfaced, Google obtained an avalanche of criticism for not solely maintaining quiet in regards to the allegations, however for paying Rubin such a beneficiant sum of cash.

The Instances story first surfaced this previous October and now, only a few months later, a pair of shareholder fits on the matter has emerged. Initially delivered to mild by the San Francisco Chronicle, each lawsuits successfully accuse the corporate’s board of permitting the harassment to proceed whereas additionally chastising board members for approving Rubin’s exit payout.

Don't Miss: Amazon has a $20 loud night breathing resolution that truly works for lots of people

A criticism from one of many lawsuits reads partially:

The person defendants knew about sexual harassment by quite a few senior Google executives, together with defendant Andy Rubin (the creator of Android cellular software program), in opposition to who credible allegations of sexual misconduct had been confirmed by way of an inside investigation. As a substitute of disciplining these senior executives, nonetheless, the person defendants protected them. The person defendants didn’t well timed disclose the harassment, after which tried to cowl up the harassment when information reviews started to counsel that egregious sexual harassment and discrimination had occurred at Google.

Whereas at Google, Rubin can be alleged to have engaged in human intercourse trafficking – paying a whole lot of hundreds of {dollars} to ladies to be, in Rubin’s personal phrases, “owned” by him. Google, in the meantime, had paid lobbyists to oppose laws in Washington that had bi-partisan assist and south to fight human intercourse trafficking.

“There was substantial proof of sexual harassment at Google, and but there hasn’t been the suitable follow-through,” one of many plaintiff’s attorneys stated throughout a latest press convention. “Actually, fairly on the contrary, the perpetrators of the sexual harassment have been awarded handsomely.”

It’s additionally price noting that Google’s dealing with of Rubin’s case elicited fairly a response from Google staff as nicely, culminating in a coordinated international walkout amongst staff in November.

“Staff have raised constructive concepts for a way we are able to enhance our insurance policies and our processes going ahead,” Google CEO Sundar Pichai stated within the wake of the protests. “We’re taking in all their suggestions so we are able to flip these concepts into motion.”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here